Monday, August 24, 2015

"The Midnight Knock!"by Fr Cedric Prakash (in INDIAN CURRENTS) August 24th 2015

The Midnight Knock!

The Midnight Knock!
Sanjiv Bhatt, the Gujarat State Police Officer who had the courage to take on NarendraModi over the 2002 riots was unceremoniously sacked from the services on August 19th 2015!  
A written Order served to him by the Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India dated August 13th 2015 signed by a Deputy Secretary cites indiscipline very particularly absenting himself from work without permission and that he “ Sanjiv Bhatt had remained defiant and flagrantly flouted the rules with complete disregard to discipline which should otherwise have been the hallmark of an officer of a uniformed force”. The Order served on him also says that he was given ample opportunity to present his side of the case but did not do so. Bhatt obviously has a different version of this; he immediately tweeted a response saying that he was removed on the basis of “ a sham inquiry and fabricated charges”.  
Sanjiv Bhatt’s claim to have been part of the midnight meeting of February 27th / 28th 2002 convened by the then Chief Minister NarendraModi was not accepted by the Government authorities and by the Special Investigation Team (SIT) which was appointed by the Supreme Court to probe nine cases of the 2002 Gujarat Carnage. Bhatt however has remained adamant saying that he was there; besides he has also been very vocal and vociferous in alleging that NarendraModi was the architect of the Gujarat Carnage which killed almost 2000 Muslims and left thousands more brutalised and homeless. The fact remains that ever since he took on Modi and the power of the State, Bhatt has been at the receiving end of a vindictive Government and system which seems to have been all out to get him.
Sanjiv Bhatt has served the Indian Police force for 27 long years; he joined the Service in 1988 and was allotted the Gujarat cadre. In 1990, he was accused of torturing a person in police custody in the wake of some riots in Jamnagar district. The person died of kidney failure a little later; once again in 1998 he was accused of another custodial torture case. However, from both these cases, he emerged unscathed.
A high point in his career was being appointed as the Superintendent of the Sabarmati Central Jail in Ahmedabad. As Superintendent, he became extremely popular with the prisoners and worked towards prison reforms. But the Government and his other seniors really did not like this. In just over two months, he was transferred for apparently being “too friendly” with the prisoners.   This transfer resulted in a huge backlash within the prison. More than half of the 4000 plus prisoners went on a hunger strike protesting against his transfer; about six of them even slashed their wrists in open defiance against Sanjiv’s bosses; but they did not relent much to the dismay of the prisoners.
Sanjiv Bhatt has regularly courted controversy but has also shown himself as a tough cop. When the movie ‘Singham’ was released in 2011, many in Gujarat and elsewhere saw in “Inspector BajiraoSingham” a fair bit of Sanjiv Bhatt. Singham fights against injustice, prejudice and corruption using his own brand of ethics and justice; but was not afraid to take on the system.
Bhatt completed his schooling at St. Xavier’s Loyola Hall, Ahmedabad and in 1985 he obtained an MTech degree from the Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay. In 1987, he married Shweta also from Ahmedabad. They have two children Akashi who is a young Doctor and will shortly be pursuing her higher studies in Oxford and Shantanu who is doing his architectural studies in Newcastle, UK. Another point which has hurt the establishment is that in the last Gujarat Assembly Elections in 2012 Shweta Bhatt stood against NarendraModi as a joint Opposition candidate. Modi of course won those elections convincingly.
Reacting to his dismissal, Sanjiv Bhatt posted on his facebook page and tweeted “ many friends have been asking me for my reaction on my removal from the Indian Police Service.   All I have to say is that, at the age of 24, with a passion and fire that still continues to rage in me, I chose the Indian Police Service because I saw it as a career that would add action and purpose to my life.   And I have not been disappointed one bit.   In fact, I have enjoyed every moment of the last 27 years in the IPS.   The Government of the day has decided to remove me from service after conducting a sham, ex parte inquiry on completely fabricated charges of ‘unauthorised absence from duty’.   Mind you, this so-called ‘unauthorised absence from duty’ pertains to the period when I was deposing before the SIT (investigating into the Zakia Jafri complaint) and the Nanavati commission (inquiring into the Gujarat riots). Be that as it may, the bottom-line is that if the Government of the day does not require my services...so be it.   I pray to God that He may continue to kindle and stoke the passion and fire that has possessed me all these years.   May He continue to lead me in my just pursuits.
Whatever the merits or the demerits of Sanjiv Bhatt be, one thing quite transparent is that the Government has been all out to get him! This is evident from the fact that Sanjiv Bhatt was systematically denied his promotion to the rank of Inspector General of Police (IGP) when most of his batch-mates were promoted several years ago.
Bhatt has now emerged as another victim of the “midnight knock” which takes place so often when the powers just want to get rid of someone. But that knock has also meant that Sanjiv Bhatt has become yet another hero to the resistance that is gradually but surely emerging in the country.
When he heard of his father’s dismissal from the services, Shantanu who was in London wrote a moving tribute to his father which has since gone viral; he concludes his letter saying “ and lastly, I would like to congratulate you for getting freedom from the shackles of this rancorous government which tries to break and antagonise anyone who tries to speak up against them, or tries to stand up for what is right! In this new chapter of your life, I would wish you all the very best for pursuing whatever makes you happy and satisfies you and we as a family will always be behind you, supporting every decision you take!”
A powerful message for every citizen in the country today!
(* Fr. Cedric Prakash SJ is the Director of PRASHANT, the Ahmedabad-based Jesuit Centre for Human Rights, Justice and Peace.)
(Published on 24th August 2015, Volume XXVII, Issue 3 4 )
- See more at: http://www.indiancurrents.org/detailedarticle.php?d=679#sthash.NAxylJSg.dpuf

'LAUDATO SI’: POPE FRANCIS CHALLENGES THE WHOLE OF HUMANITY! By Fr. Cedric Prakash SJ*(in Karnataka Jesuits Writers Forum)

LAUDATO SI’: POPE FRANCIS CHALLENGES THE WHOLE OF HUMANITY! By Fr. Cedric Prakash SJ*

care-my-planetPope Francis’ Encyclical‘Laudato Si: On Care for our Common Home’ was released on June 18th.  In the opening statements to the Encyclical, Pope Francis makes his intention clear “to address every person living on this planet” (#3).  He says “this sister (mother earth) now cries out to us because of the harm we have inflicted on her by our irresponsible use and abuse of the goods with which God has endowed her.  We have come to see ourselves as her lords and masters, entitled to plunder her at will. The violence present in our hearts, wounded by sin, is also reflected in the symptoms of sickness evident in the soil, in the water, in the air and in all forms of life” (#2).
In the first Chapter, he states that “we cannot adequately combat environmental degradation unless we attend to causes related to human and social degradation” (#48); he deals here with several “aspects of the present ecological crisis”:  pollution, waste and the throw-away culture; climate as a common good; displacement and migration caused by environmental degradation; access to safe drinking water as a basic and universal human right; loss of bio-diversity; decline in the quality of human life and break down of society; global inequality. He also denounces pesticides and genetically engineered (GE) crops.
Pope Francis blatantly notes that “the earth’s resources are also being plundered because of short-sighted approaches to the economy, commerce and production” (#32).  In making such statements, in taking a stand for the ‘care of our common home’, Pope Francis has indeed created several enemies among the rich and powerful, the vested interests and those who are bent on profiteering by plundering very precious and scarce natural resources. This is indicative from the fact that a new Gallup Poll conducted in the United States after the Encyclical was released shows that his ratings had dropped by more than 18% points among fairly large sections of Americans and particularly the rich and the conservatives.
But Pope Francis certainly does not care. Throughout the Encyclical, he has been insisting that we have been called to be stewards of the creation God has entrusted to us.  He ensures that ‘Laudato Si’ focuses on human rights violations and injustices. He does not mince words when he says “in the present condition of global society, where injustices abound and growing numbers of people are deprived of basic human rights and considered expendable, committing oneself to the common good means to make choices in solidarity based on a preferential option for the poorest of our brothers and sisters”  (#158).
What is needed ultimately, emphasizes Pope Francis, is a radical commitment to ensure that positive change which is the need of the hour. For this he says, every section of society must play a definite role. The Pope does not spare the priests of the Catholic Church and he calls upon them to engage with the faithful on environmental issues. He calls upon international and national Governments and mechanisms: “the same mindset which stands in the way of making radical decisions to reverse the trend of global warming also stands in the way of achieving the goal of eliminating poverty.  A more responsible overall approach is needed to deal with both problems: the reduction of pollution and the development of poorer countries and regions” (#175)
There is always the danger that several would like to keep ‘Laudato Si’ at the level of cosmeticization; to tinker with bits and parts, to be selective and comfortable in its reading; but ‘Laudato Si’ is indeed path-breaking, radical in nature, it makes one uncomfortable and touches every single dimension of our human existence.  The Pope invites all to an ecological conversion, tochange directions so that we can truly care for our common home; he challenges all: “what kind of world do we want to leave to those who come after us, to children who are now growing up?” (#160). Not to pay heed to Pope Francis’ prophetic words, to rubbish this timely and important message or to relegate it to mere tree-planting would certainly be a great disservice not to the Pope but to Planet Earth!

About the author

Saturday, August 22, 2015

HC STAYS COMPULSORY VOTING RULE

HC STAYS COMPULSORY VOTING RULE

HC stays compulsory voting rule
Gujarat government's controversial legislation making voting compulsory in civic body polls and imposing a fine for any violation was on Friday stayed by the High Court which observed that the 'right to vote' itself provided right to refrain from voting. Under rules notified by the state government in July for implementation of the compulsory voting law, a fine of Rs 100 is to be levied on voters if a registered voter failed to vote in the local body polls in the state without giving any valid reasons.

There are conditional relaxations for elderly, students, those suffering from illness, mourning a death or attending a wedding on the day of election. The local body polls in 253 municipalities, 208 taluka panchayats, 26 district panchayats and six municipal corporations are expected to be held in October this year. The 'right to vote' itself provides right to refrain from voting and it cannot be turned into 'duty of voting', HC observed while admitting a petition challenging the Gujarat Local Authorities (Amendment) Act 2009, which makes voting mandatory in local body polls in the state.

VIOLATION OF RIGHTS

The division bench of acting Chief Justice Jayant Patel and Justice N V Anjariya stayed implementation of compulsory voting while admitting the plea filed by lawyer K R Koshti of Swaraj Abhiyan against the Act. A Bill making voting compulsory for all the citizens in civic bodies was passed by the state Assembly in 2009 and became a law when present Governor O P Kohli signed it. Petitioner's lawyer P S Champaneri submitted, "The right to vote is an expression of a citizen and whether or not to vote includes the right to not vote. The right to vote cannot be termed as the duty by the state and therefore the provision of compulsory voting Act is violative of fundamental rights given to any citizen under the Indian Constitution."

He also argued that the state Legislatures does not have any legislative competence to enact a law regarding voting, as it comes under the purview of the Constitution and any such law can only be amended or enacted by Parliament. The petitioner demanded that the Gujarat government and the State Election Commission be restrained from implementing the provisions of the Gujarat Local Authorities (Amendment) Act, 2009.

MOOTED BY MODI 

The Gujarat Local Authorities (Amendment) Bill was first introduced in the state Assembly in December 2009 and passed by a majority vote when Modi was chief minister. It was, however, returned by the then Governor Dr Kamla Beniwal in April 2010 with remarks that "forcing voter to vote is against the principles of an individual liberty". Beniwal had returned the Bill to the government, with her comments, for reconsideration. "The present Bill violates the freedom which a citizen is entitled to enjoy under Article 21 of the Constitution," she had said in her letter asking the then state government to make amendments to the Bill. However, ignoring her suggestions, the then state government had once again got the bill passed on December 28, 2011 by majority vote in the Gujarat Assembly which was sent to Beniwal for her assent.

In November 2014, after the change of government in Delhi, Gujarat Governor O P Kohli gave his approval. The proposal to make voting compulsory in local elections was drawn up when Modi was chief minister. Although he stepped down from the post in May last year after his triumph in general election, the legislation continued to be steered through the state legislature and was finally approved last month. Modi's support for the measure has led to expectations that he may try to make voting compulsory in other polls.

HC ORDER HAILED 

Opposition Congress hailed the order, but the BJP government vowed to "not give up legal fight" over the matter and "exhaust all remedies" available. Senior Congress leader Shankarsinh Vaghela said, "The stay order is a warning to the state government's action against democracy. The HC order is a slap on the face of BJP leaders who have autocratic mindset." Sociologist Gaurang Jani also welcomed the stay, saying: "Voting is the constitutional right of a citizen but it should not be made compulsory. It is a citizen's choice whether s/he wants to vote.

Instead of forcing people to vote, how about making it compulsory for political leaders to fulfill their commitments. Why are they not held responsible for not fulfilling the assurances they gave during poll campaign?" Human rights activist Father Cedric Prakash said, "Making voting compulsory is against human rights. People should be encouraged to vote by making elections free and fair. Even today, there are several people whose names are not part of the voters' list. I welcome the HC order as they have stopped violation of human rights."

Meanwhile, government spokesperson and Health Minister Nitin Patel said, "We will go through the HC order and take further action. We are not going to give up. This is just a stay, not a final order. We will definitely fight the case till the end." Asked if the BJP Government will challenge the stay order before the Supreme Court, Patel said the administration will exhaust "all legal remedies" in the case.

Wednesday, August 19, 2015

Book Withdrawal Game The vows prescribed by Ambedkar; due to which Gujarat Government has withdrawn the Ambedkar book distributed in schools


Book Withdrawal Game
Book on Ambedkar withdrawn in Gujarat Schools


-
The vows prescribed by Ambedkar; due to which Gujarat Government has withdrawn the Ambedkar book distributed in schools

Dr.B.R.Ambedkar prescribed 22 vows to his followers during the historic religious conversion to Buddhism on 15 October 1956 at Deeksha Bhoomi, Nagpur in India. The conversion to Buddhism by 800,000 people was historic because it was the largest religious conversion, the world has ever witnessed. He prescribed these oaths so that there may be complete severance of bond with Hinduism. These 22 vows struck a blow at the roots of Hindu beliefs and practices. These vows could serve as a bulwark to protect Buddhism from confusion and contradictions. These vows could liberate converts from superstitions, wasteful and meaningless rituals, which have led to pauperisation of masses and enrichment of upper castes of Hindus.
The famous 22 vows are:
  1. I shall have no faith in Brahma, Vishnu and Mahesh nor shall I worship them.
  2. I shall have no faith in Rama and Krishna who are believed to be incarnation of God nor shall I worship them.
  3. I shall have no faith in ‘Gauri’, Ganapati and other gods and goddesses of Hindus nor shall I worship them.
  4. I do not believe in the incarnation of God.
  5. I do not and shall not believe that Lord Buddha was the incarnation of Vishnu. I believe this to be sheer madness and false propaganda.
  6. I shall not perform ‘Shraddha’ nor shall I give ‘pind-dan’.
  7. I shall not act in a manner violating the principles and teachings of the Buddha.
  8. I shall not allow any ceremonies to be performed by Brahmins.
  9. I shall believe in the equality of man.
  10. I shall endeavour to establish equality.
  11. I shall follow the ‘noble eightfold path’ of the Buddha.
  12. I shall follow the ‘paramitas’ prescribed by the Buddha.
  13. I shall have compassion and loving kindness for all living beings and protect them.
  14. I shall not steal.
  15. I shall not tell lies.
  16. I shall not commit carnal sins.
  17. I shall not take intoxicants like liquor, drugs etc.
  18. I shall endeavour to follow the noble eightfold path and practise compassion and loving kindness in every day life.
  19. I renounce Hinduism which is harmful for humanity and impedes the advancement and development of humanity because it is based on inequality, and adopt Buddhism as my religion.
  20. I firmly believe the Dhamma of the Buddha is the only true religion.
  21. I believe that I am having a re-birth.
  22. I solemnly declare and affirm that I shall hereafter lead my life according to the principles and teachings of the Buddha and his Dhamma.

Branding Adivasis And Activists As Maoists The Government Has Declared A War On Its Own People By Arundhati Roy-19 August, 2015

Branding Adivasis And Activists As Maoists The Government Has Declared A War On Its Own People
By Arundhati Roy
19 August, 2015
Indiaresists.com
Following is the text of a note by writer-activist, Arundhati Roy, which she read out during a press conference at Press Club of India, Delhi, to express solidarity with Soni Sori & Linga Kodopi and the People of Bastar. Adv. Prashant Bhushan, Adv. Vrinda Grover,Annie Raja and Himanshu Kumar also addressed the Press Conference.
The Mining companies are getting restless. The MOUs that were signed handing over Adivasi land to them have not been actualized because of the resistance from local people. Operation Green Hunt continues as Operation No-Name. The Salwa Judum is being re-constituted. Once again SPOs are beginning to kill villagers and call them Naxalites. Anybody who criticizes or impedes the implementation of State policy is called a Maoist. Thousands of Dalits and Adivasis, thus labeled, are in jail absurdly charged with crimes like Sedition and Waging War against the State under the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA. While villagers languish for years in prison, with no legal help and no hope of justice, often not even sure what crime they have been accused of, the State has turned its attention to what it calls ‘OGWs’—Overground Workers.

The Ministry of Home Affairs spelled out its intentions clearly in its 2013 affidavit filed in the Supreme Court. It said: “The ideologues and supporters of the CPI(Maoist) in cities and towns have undertaken a concerted and systematic propaganda against the State to project it in a poor light…it is these ideologues who have kept the Maoist movement alive and are in many ways more dangerous than the cadres of the People’s Liberation Guerilla Army.”
The harassment of Soni Sori, Linga who have already spent many years in jail, the arrest of Professor G.N. Saibaba who was recently released on bail and is still in hospital, the harassment of Himanshu Kumar who has been hounded out of Bastar, are all part of this Operation. I have just heard that the Odisha Police in Malkangiri District are hunting down a documentary filmmaker and human rights activist Deba Ranjan. I know Deba Ranjan very well. He has made excellent films on the communal violence I Kandhamal and the assault on adivasi homelands in Malkangiri. He has worked with K, Balagopal on several fact-finding missions. He is in Malkangiri, in South Odisha, the district abutting Sukma in Bastar—so roughly the same area. The police have filed seven criminal cases against him. He is underground now, fearing for his life. Either way, whether they arrest him or they do not, they have stopped his work.
The last time Soni Sori and Linga came to Delhi, addressed tribunals and Press conferences, we were unable to save them. Soni was arrested and despite pleading with the magistrate in a Delhi Court to not be sent back to Jagdalpur for fear of torture, she was sent back. And both she and Linga were brutally tortured. They have spent years in prison, both of them came close to death. The media did play a part in managing to get them released. And now they are here again. Hounded by the same terror that is backed by the same commercial interests.
Ankit Garg, the policeman who Soni Sori says supervised her torture—which included, among other things, pushing stones up her vagina—in police custody, was awarded a Police Gallantry Award by the President of India, on Republic Day in 2012. Many people were outraged and condemned this. Personally, given the state of affairs in this country, I thought it was an honest declaration of intent by the Indian State. I only wish the award citation had been honest too. In cases like this one, the citation could have said: “This Award is hereby conferred on Officer XYZ for bravely supervising the torture and sexual molestation of a dangerous Adivasi school teacher.”


Monday, August 10, 2015

Pope Francis Is Making Christianity Radical Again






POPE FRANCIS IS NOT LIBERAL,
 BUT RADICAL (= GROUNDED BY CHRISTIAN ROOTS) 
July 21, 2015

Pope Francis Is Making Christianity Radical Again

The pope is calling out a status quo that global elites benefit from at the expense of the poor.
by John Gehring
POPE FRANCIS IS MAKING CHRISTIANITY RADICAL AGAIN 9/8/2015
 


THE POPE IS CALLING OUT A STATUS QUO THAT ELITES BENEFIT
 FROM AT THE EXPENSE OF THE POOR

During his recent whirlwind trip to three of the poorest countries in South America, Pope Francis was a man on fire. He played the role of thunderous Old Testament prophet, community organizer, and even a revolutionary rallying the downtrodden to stand up to injustice. In a speech in Bolivia widely viewed as one of the most important and far-reaching of his papacy, the pope brought an urgent message that should make global elites nervous.

The first pope from Latin America will visit the United States in three months and become the first pontiff to address Congress. If his South American tour is any indication, the powers that be here in the world’s financial, media, and military epicenter should buckle up.

Let us not be afraid to say it: we want change, real change, structural change,” Francis told representatives from indigenous communities, workers, and activists fighting for social reforms. The pope highlighted what he called “the three Ls” (labor, lodging, and land) as central to human dignity. He warned time was “running out” to address ecological destruction and climate change. He railed against a “new colonialism” that includes fiscal austerity measures and “certain free trade agreements.” The profit-first (greed ALSO INCLUDED)mentality of global capitalism, Francis argues, is morally indefensible.

“Let us say ‘no’ to an economy of exclusion and inequality, where money rules rather than serves,” the pope said in what has now become a defining theme of his papacy. “That economy kills. That economy excludes. That economy destroys Mother Earth.”

A pope who is radical, not liberal

It’s tempting to squeeze this maverick pope into secular political categories. Some media coverage has reflected this instinct by describing the pope as a leftist. In many ways, this is understandable. The pope’s searing critique of the socioeconomic status quo — what he calls “an idolatrous system which excludes, debases, and kills” — is left of the Democratic party. Hillary Clinton might agonize over how far to go in challenging the titans on Wall Street, but the pope has, well let’s just say, fewer political calculations to consider.

The pope also uses language that would be familiar to Occupy Wall Street activists, who in 2011 made Zuccotti Park a magnet for those challenging the presumptions of unbridled market fundamentalism, or leaders who mobilized massive protests in Seattle against the World Trade Organization in 1999.
In fact, while some in the liberal establishment turned up a collective nose at Occupy, Cardinal Peter Turkson of Ghana, who leads the Vatican’s justice and peace council and wrote the first draft of the pope’s recent encyclical, said at the time that the “basic sentiment” behind Occupy Wall Street aligned with traditional principles of Catholic social teaching on the economy.

While Pope Francis’ populist rhetoric warms the hearts of many liberals — including those who wish the church would pipe down on issues of sexuality and marriage — it’s a mistake to pigeonhole him with conventional secular terms. His source of inspiration is the radical message at the heart of the Gospels. In the shadow of the Roman Empire, Jesus put the poor and those on the peripheries at the center of his ministry.

He rattled the righteous defenders of the religious law, scandalized many, and fulfilled the message of the prophet Isaiah: “The Spirit of the Lord is on me because he has anointed me to proclaim good news to the poor. He has sent me to proclaim freedom for the prisoners and recovery of sight to the blind, to set the oppressed free . . . ”
In Bolivia, Pope Francis specifically anchored his denunciation of a corporate globalization that has lifted some boats but has done little for those languishing in the villas miseries of Buenos Aires and the favelas of Rio in this context. “This system runs counter to the plan of Jesus,” the pope said bluntly. “Working for a just distribution of the fruits of the earth and human labor is not mere philanthropy. It is a moral obligation. For Christians, the responsibility is even greater: it is a commandment.”
In Ecuador, the pope made it plain: “Our faith is always revolutionary.”

A pope who upholds Catholic social teaching

If you have a problem with what Pope Francis is saying, your real problem is with the Hebrew prophets, Jesus of Nazareth, and a century of Catholic social teaching about the common good.

Some conservatives determined to paint Pope Francis as naïve and marginalize him as a Marxist have clear political motivations. “This pope grew up in a third world country that, frankly, is an example of what happens when you don’t have capitalism and democracy,” scoffed former ambassador Otto Reich, the assistant secretary of state for Western Hemisphere affairs in the George W. Bush administration.

Rep. Paul Ryan, a Catholic who has mistakenly argued his budget proposals are consonant with his faith’s teachings, also strikes a condescending tone. “The guy is from Argentina,” Ryan told the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel in 2013. “They have crony capitalism in Argentina. They don’t have a true free enterprise system.” Leaving aside the stunning arrogance and myopia in those statements — Wall Street greed and criminal behavior get a free pass — these critiques are part of a larger effort to delegitimize the pope when it comes to economic justice.

Ryan and Co. conveniently ignore the fact that the Catechism of the Catholic Church refers to “sinful inequalities” that are “in open contradiction to the Gospel.” The Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church, published by the Vatican under Pope John Paul II, states that “wealth exists to be shared” and that “evil is seen in the immoderate attachment to riches and the desire to hoard.”

This doesn’t make Pope Francis or the Catholic Church anti-market or anti-capitalist. Catholic teaching is clear that the economy should exist to serve human beings, not the other way around. Ever since Pope Leo XIII issued the church’s first social encyclical in 1891, at a time when the savage inequalities of the Industrial Revolution left workers with little protection against the whims of rapacious owners, the church has advocated for living wages, the need for unions, and prudent oversight of markets to ensure human dignity is not sacrificed on what Pope Francis has called “the altar of money.”

Pope John Paul II spoke about the “priority of labor over capital.” Pope Benedict XVI challenged the “scandal of glaring inequalities.” Francis is building on themes addressed by his predecessors, while clearly putting more institutional muscle behind inequality and social exclusion.

It’s true that Pope Francis is shaped by his experiences in Argentina, and his unique vision as the first non-European pontiff in over a millennium. This is an asset. As Archbishop of Buenos Aires, then-Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio earned a reputation for being the “Bishop of the Slums” for the considerable time he spent in the toughest sectors of town. During the 2002 Argentine debt crisis, along with other Catholic bishops, Bergoglio spoke out against fiscal austerity measures and pointed to “social exclusion, a growing gap between rich and poor, and . . . the negative consequences of globalization and the tyranny of markets.”

A pope who brings a perspective from the peripheries and aligns with the powerless knows his harshest critics are waiting for him in the United States. Expect the backlash to Pope Francis’ urgent pleas for action on climate change and inequality to heat up in the lead up to his visit. The most influential moral leader in the world today is calling out a status quo that political and financial elites benefit from at the expense of the poor. Those who prefer religion safe and sanitized — or relegated to issues of sexual morality — are on the defensive for good reason.

“Artists are here to disturb the peace,” the American writer James Baldwin once wrote. The same might apply to a pope bringing radical Christianity back to center stage.
Image courtesy of Shutterstock. 

 
John Gehring
Written by