Friday, August 01, 2008

STATEMENT FROM CONCERNED CITIZENS OF GUJARAT RE. RECENT BOMB BLASTS

CONCERNED CITIZENS OF GUJARAT
 
STATEMENT ON THE RECENT BOMB BLASTS
 

We, the Concerned Citizens (some of us representing groups / organizations / networks) condemn in no uncertain terms, the recent bomb blasts in Ahmedabad and Bangalore .

We do believe and reaffirm that violence and terror in any form have no place in a law-governed, justice-seeking and humane society and do not serve any real or imagined purpose.

We express our deep heart-felt sympathy and solidarity with all those killed or injured in these blasts. We condole with all our sisters and brothers who have lost their near and dear ones. May the departed souls rest in peace.

We pledge to do all we can, both as individuals and groups, to respond to the immediate needs of those affected; be it in ensuring that proper medical care is given; be it in the care of their children who have been orphaned or any other long term measures for their full and just rehabilitation.

We call upon the State and Central Government to provide just and adequate relief and compensation to all those who are affected and to ensure that this reaches the victims without any kind of discrimination and without any bureaucratic delays or hassles. We commit ourselves to render all assistance to them in securing all relief and compensation declared by the Government.

We earnestly appeal to all those involved in this violence or any other acts of violence to stop this madness immediately. Let them realize that all of us irrespective of our caste, creed or language are capable of joint struggle for just, equal and better society and none of these violent or terrorist acts will deter us or deflect us from our path of seeking justice by all democratic ways. We are fully aware that there are several issues which need to be resolved, that there are flagrant violations of human rights and there are gross abuses of law and denial of justice, but people's democratic struggle is the answer, not violence or senseless terrorism.

We strongly oppose and condemn all mischievous attempts by vested interests and government authorities to communalize the whole issue, to target and to terrorize one community and to frighten another community with a feeling of insecurity. We are deeply distressed and anguished by the widespread harassment and illegal detention of the members of one community only, in order to cover up the police and intelligence failures in detecting and preventing the terrorist acts. This is nothing but the denial and violence of the basic human rights guaranteed by our Constitution and assured by the International law of Human Rights. State terrorism is no answer to private terrorism. We promise all innocent people who are sought to be harassed or detained by the police that their human rights will be protected.

We have no doubt that the series of blasts in Ahmedabad in a well-orchested manner demonstrate the total failure of our intelligence system which is unfortunately politicized to serve the interests of the ruling party. We fail to understand as to how the anti-terrorist squad, much boasted about can collect every small piece of information of conspiracy to kill our Chief Minister (C.M) and other dignitaries but is stunned and did not have any information about a well and executed series of bomb blasts in different parts of the city at regular intervals of 10 to 15 minutes. The people would like to ask as to how the other C.M (viz. Common Man) failed to get the same assistance from our Intelligence Bureau. Is it that only the Chief Minister's life is valuable, but not the life of a Common Man?

We also believe that the demand for POTA or Gujarat Act is only a political demand to mislead the people. Those leaders conveniently forget that almost all stringent and draconian provisions of the POTA except provision regarding confession before the police and bails are reproduced in the Prevention of Unlawful Activities Act under which the police, if willing, can effectively act. These leaders also forget that terrorist attacks on the Parliament and Akshardham in Gandhinagar and Gujarat Carnage of 2002 took place when POTA was very much there. Will they explain why they could not prevent them, even though they were in power both in the State and in the Centre?

We call upon the State Government to immediately constitute a Judicial Commission under the Chairmanship of a Sitting Supreme Court Judge to investigate into the why, what and how of these organized terrorist acts of bomb blasts in Ahmedabad. It is necessary for the people to know the whole truth and nothing but the truth, however unpalatable it might turn out to be. We strongly condemn all direct and subtle attempts on the part of certain vested interests to make one or the other community appears to be guilty or blameworthy, instead of establishing the truth by independent and impartial enquiry and investigation agency.

These bomb blasts indiscriminately killing or maiming common people of large parts of the city open up a great opportunity for all of us constituting the civil society to come together, forgetting our differences and our past and to challenge terrorism of all groups and of all kinds and fight together to save our society, our nation and our humanity. Only people living and walking in harmony can alone defeat terrorism from all sides. Let us stand one and united and challenge all divisive forces out to destroy our rich national heritage of pluralism and diversity.

Signed Ahmedabad 30th July, 2008

Girish Patel

Hiren Gandhi

Sophia Khan

Saroop Dhruv

Justice A.P. Ravani

Cedric Prakash

Hanif Lakdawala

Francis Parmar

Prof. J. Bandukwala

Rakesh Sharma

Prof. Nisar Ansari

Piyush O. Desai

P.K. Valera

Mukul Sinha

Ashok Vaghela

Sheeba George

Pushpa Iyer

Damayanti S. Parekh

Digant Oza

Nafisa Barot

Gautam Thaker

Shamshad Pathan

Savita Xalvo

Edwin Masihi

Gaurang Raval

Manisha Trivedi

Rohit Patel

Rupa Mody

Amrish N. Patel

Indu Kumar Jani

Abid Shamsi

Jwalant Mehta

(and about 200 others)

Monday, July 21, 2008

NEW MALAYALAM FILM PORTRAYS POST-2002 GUJARTA REALITY

 
New Malayalam film portrays post-2002 Gujarat Reality
Published: Sunday, 20 July, 2008, 01:30 AM Doha
Timehttp://www.gulf-times.com/site/topics/article.asp?cu_no=2&item_no=231039&version=1&template_id=40&parent_id=22
 
Ashraf Padanna
Suhasini and ChandranTHIRUVANANTHAPURAM:
 
Malayalam filmmaker TV Chandran's latest offering Vilapangalkkappuram (Beyond the Wail) speaks of Muslim women victims of 2002 Gujarat riots who believe in "the country and its laws".
"I visited these women five years after the notorious riots. It was (social activist) Shabnam Hashmi who took me around. They were still in camps, after all those serial rapes and atrocities. They lost their men and their land. But their spirit was intact," said Chandran after the premiere of the film here.
 
"They believe in the great nation that is India. They believe that the Indian courts will bring justice to them. And they continue to fight for justice".
The story revolves around a teenaged girl Zahira whose Keralite father was running a teashop in Ahmedabad during the riots. The rioters ransack his shop and kill him, gang rape his wife and teenaged daughter, dump them in a well and set fire to their bodies after dousing in petrol.
 
Zahira escapes in the dead of the night and reaches Kozhikode. But there she is haunted by religious fundamentalists and she escapes back to Gujarat to fight for the rights of the women victims.
"The day after the Godhra, we were enjoying a fashion show in Kozhikode. Gujarat riots still figure in the state's politics but the real issue is often swept under the carpet. What were we doing to these girls in the name of religion?" Chandran told reporters here.
The hapless girl faces attempted rape in Kerala while the elders in the community compel her to take refuge in polygamy against her will. On the wedding night when the elderly groom tries to overpower her she is reminded of the gang rape, resists him and runs away.
Five years late, she is seen in Ahmedabad again with a group of riot victims fighting for their rights.
"In Gujarat or in Kerala, girls fall victim to the religious fanatics everywhere. Growing religious fundamentalism poses a threat to women in Kerala as well. The flora and fauna have their space here but not the woman".
Chandran had to face stiff opposition in Gujarat while shooting there and had to pack off at one stage. He then shifted his location to Mysore to complete the film, which is written and produced by Congress party leader Aryadan Shoukath.
The cast includes Priyanka, Suhasini, Biju Menon, Thilakan, Gopakumar, Sreeraman, Indrans, Praveena, Zeenath, Santa Devi, Nilambur Aysha and N K Raveendran.
The hero of his 2004 film, Kadhavaseshan, end his life ashamed of living after he knows that the little girl he befriended in Gujarat was gang-raped and killed in the riots. "This is a sequel to that film, if you want to see that way," Chandran said.
This is the second film that Shoukath and Chandran joins hand for, the first being the ward-winning Padom Onnu: Oru Vilapam. The film also fetched Meera Jasmine the National award for the best actor.
M J Radhakrishnan cranks the camera while M Jayachandran has set score to Girish Punthencherry's lyrics. The film is planning August release in India and abroad.
 
 
 
__._,_.___

 

Friday, July 04, 2008

IF YOU HAVE NOT YET SIGNED THE PETITION ONLINE ON 'FREEDOM OF SPEECH, EXPRESSION AND CONSCIENCE '.....PLEASE DO SO ! Thanks !

Dear Friends,

Greetings from Ahmedabad !

For those of you who have already signed the Online Petition, we wish to convey our deep and sincere gratitude !
 
Because of the interest generated on the subject and the desire of so many to uphond the Freedom of Speech, Expression and Conscience, we send this Online Petition to you, request you to sign it and also to circulate it to your other contacts, friends, collaborators.  We also request you to excuse us for cross-posting in some cases.  Thanks in anticipation for your support and solidarity. 
 
An Online Petition addressed to The President of India, and entitled :
 
"Against Violation of Freedom of Speech, Expression and Conscience in
Gujarat, India"
 
has been  hosted on the web by PetitionOnline.com, the free online petition
service, at:
 
 
                      http://www.PetitionOnline.com/freguj08/
 
 
In context of the prevailing situation in Gujarat, we request you to read
and sign the petition and also to forward  it  to all your friends, well
wishers and concerned citizens so that they can read and sign this petition
too.
 
Do get back to us if you need  any clarification or desire further
information.
 
Thanking you,
 
 With warm wishes,
 
Fr. Cedric Prakash sj
 


- - - - - - - -     - - - - - - - -    - - - - - - -   - - - - -
PRASHANT  -  A Centre for Human Rights, Justice and Peace
 

Street Address : Hill Nagar, Near Kamdhenu Hall, Drive-in Road, Ahmedabad - 380052, Gujarat, India
Postal Address : P B 4050, Navrangpura PO, Ahmedabad - 380 009, Gujarat, India
 
Phone : 91  79   27455913,  66522333
Fax : 91  79  27489018
Email: sjprashant@gmail.com
www.humanrightsindia.in

 

Tuesday, July 01, 2008

Coalition Against Genocide calls for the continuation of Visa an on Modi

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

 

July 1, 2008
 
The Honorable Condoleezza Rice
Secretary of State
U.S. Department of State
2201 C St. NW
Washington, DC 20520
 
 
Dear Secretary Rice,
 
It has come to our attention that the Chief Minister of Gujarat, Mr. Narendra Modi is once again planning to apply for a visa to enter the United States. We urge the State Department not to allow Mr. Modi to enter the country under any conditions, as the circumstances under which he was denied a visa in 2005 remain largely unchanged, and the minority communities in his state continue to face systematic human rights violations.
 
The United States should not unwittingly be the platform from which these unrepentant and yet ascendant forces in India exploit the opportunity to rally the support base among Indian Diaspora communities and raise international legitimacy and standing. It would be dangerous at this juncture of Indian political process to give Mr. Modi that long denied and therefore much coveted window.
 
Not only was Mr. Modi responsible for the deaths of over 2,000 Muslims and the displacement of 200,000 more, but six years after the Gujarat-state sponsored violence, the Muslim community in Gujarat is subjected to a devastating economic and social boycott, institutionalized at every level. Most have received little, if no compensation for the deaths of loved ones and loss of property; thousands are still displaced, without homes, work, or access to decent schools for their children. At the level of the courts too, Muslims in Gujarat have received little justice, barring a few exceptions; and the few that have managed to push their cases forward have met with threats, physical harm and harassment.
 
As recently as April 2008, Mr. Modi enacted the anti-conversion law in Gujarat that effectively bars religious conversions, thereby crippling the provisions of religious freedom in the state.
 
In a recent expose by the investigative magazine Tehelka, the Gujarat state prosecutor appointed by Mr. Modi was captured on video confessing to protecting the perpetrators of the 2002 violence. Further, one of the accused involved in the killings, confessed to Mr. Modi having transferred several court judges as to protect him from any convictions.
 
Noting the prejudice extending at every level of the state apparatus, the Supreme Court ordered cases related to the 2002 massacres to be moved out of Gujarat.
 
Mr. Modi has not only expressed no remorse for the 2002 violence; but he has continued to justify them, as he has a spate of extra judicial killings (fake "encounter killings") by his police. And, the state continues to persecute civil society groups who have been trying to speak up for the victims under very difficult circumstances.
 
Attached please find the reports of human rights organizations and related references on Gujarat.
 
Sincerely,

Coalition Against Genocide
 

CC:
    Bureau of Democracy
    Human Rights and Labor
    Bureau of South and Central Asian Affairs
    India Desk
    Democracy and Global Affairs
 
The Coalition Against Genocide includes a diverse spectrum of organizations associated with Indian Americans that have come together in response to the Gujarat Genocide to demand justice and accountability. This letter has been endorsed by the following constituent organizations of the Coalition Against Genocide:

   1. Alliance for a Secular and Democratic South Asia (ASDSA)
   2. Association of Indian Muslims of America (AIM)
   3. Campaign to Stop Funding Hate (CSFH)
   4. Coalition for a Secular and Democratic India (CSDI)
   5. Dalit Freedom Network (DFN)
   6. Dharma Megha Inc.
   7. Friends of South Asia (FOSA)
   8. Gujarati Muslim Association of America (GMAA)
   9. Hindu Vaishnava Center for Enlightenment
  10. India Development Society
  11. India Foundation Inc.
  12. Indian Buddhist Association
  13. Indian Muslim Council-USA (IMC-USA)
  14. Indian Muslim Educational Foundation of North America (IMEFNA)
  15. Indian Muslim Relief & Charities (IMRC)
  16. International Service Society
  17. International South Asia Forum-NY (INSAF-NY)
  18. Muslim Vohra Association
  19. Muslim Youth Awareness Alliance (MYAA)
  20. Non-Resident Indians for Secular and Harmonious India (NRI-SAHI)
  21. Seva International
  22. Sikh American Heritage Organization (SAHO)
  23. South Asian Progressive Action Collective (SAPAC)
  24. Supporters of Human Rights in India (SHRI)
  25. Vedanta Society of East Lansing


CONTACT:
Dr. Hyder Khan
Phone/Fax: 443-927-9039   
media@coalitionagainstgenocide.org


REFERENCES:

Five years on - the bitter and uphill struggle for justice in Gujarat
Amnesty International Report, published on March 2007, 19 pages.
http://amnesty.org/en/library/asset/ASA20/007/2007/en/dom-ASA200072007en.pdf
 
India: A pattern of unlawful killings by the Gujarat police
Amnesty International Briefing, published on May 24, 2007, 15 pages.
http://amnesty.org/en/library/asset/ASA20/011/2007/en/dom-ASA200112007en.pdf
 
India: Gujarat Chief Minister Endorses Unlawful Killings
Human Rights Watch, December 7, 2007
http://hrw.org/english/docs/2007/12/07/india17510_txt.htm
 
Gujarat state fails to protect women from violence
Amnesty International Report, published on 27 January 2005
http://amnesty.org/en/library/asset/ASA20/001/2005/en/dom-ASA200012005en.pdf
 
DISCOURAGING DISSENT: Intimidation and Harassment of Witnesses, Human Rights Activists, and Lawyers Pursuing Accountability for the 2002 Communal Violence in Gujarat
Human Rights Watch Report, published September 2004, 30 pages.
http://www.hrw.org/backgrounder/asia/india/gujarat/gujarat0904.pdf
 
Devil's Advocate
(Transcript of Gujarat Advocate General Arvind Pandya confessing to protecting the perpetrators of 2002 Gujarat massacres, captured on a hidden camera by Tehelka Magazine in a recent expose)
http://www.tehelka.com/story_main35.asp?filename=Ne031107DEVIL.asp
VIDEO CONFESSION: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A9KlevWeYrE
 
"After Killing Them, I Felt Like Maharana Pratap"
(Transcript of Babu Bajrangi's confessions caught on a hidden video camera by Tehelka Magazine in a recent expose)
http://www.tehelka.com/story_main35.asp?filename=Ne031107After_killing.asp
VIDEO CONFESSION: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mfnTl_Fwvbo

Friday, June 27, 2008

PLEASE SIGN THIS PETITION ONLINE......"Against Violation of Freedom of Speech, Expression and Conscience in Gujarat, India"

Dear Friends,
 
An Online Petition addressed to The President of India, and entitled :
 
"Against Violation of Freedom of Speech, Expression and Conscience in
Gujarat, India"
 
has been  hosted on the web by PetitionOnline.com, the free online petition
service, at:
 
 
In context of the prevailing situation in Gujarat, we request you to read
and sign the petition and also to forward  it  to all your friends, well
wishers and concerned citizens so that they can read and sign this petition
too.
 
Do get back to us if you need  any clarification or desire further
information.
 
Thanking you,
 
 With warm wishes,
 
Fr. Cedric Prakash sj
 

 - - - - - - - -     - - - - - - - -    - - - - - - -   - - - - -
 PRASHANT  -  A Centre for Human Rights, Justice and Peace
 

Street Address : Hill Nagar, Near Kamdhenu Hall, Drive-in Road, Ahmedabad -
380052, Gujarat, India
Postal Address : P B 4050, Navrangpura PO, Ahmedabad - 380 009, Gujarat,
India
 
Phone : 91  79   27455913,  66522333
Fax : 91  79  27489018
Email: sjprashant@gmail.com
www.humanrightsindia.in
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

- - - - - - - -     - - - - - - - -    - - - - - - -   - - - - -
PRASHANT  -  A Centre for Human Rights, Justice and Peace
 

Street Address : Hill Nagar, Near Kamdhenu Hall, Drive-in Road, Ahmedabad - 380052, Gujarat, India
Postal Address : P B 4050, Navrangpura PO, Ahmedabad - 380 009, Gujarat, India
 
Phone : 91  79   27455913,  66522333
Fax : 91  79  27489018
Email: sjprashant@gmail.com
www.humanrightsindia.in

Tuesday, June 24, 2008

GUJARAT STATE THE FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION CONFERENCE

GUJARAT STATE
THE FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION CONFERENCE
Organized by
J.P. Centenary Committee, PUCL, MSD, PRASHANT, Nirikshak, Bhoomi Putra, Nayamarg,  Jalseva
C/o. Gandhi Peace Foundation, Himavan, Paldi, Ahmedabad 380 006
Ph: 079-26641353     Cell: 9825382556     email: 
dn.rath@gmail.com
 
 
 
Delegation meets Governor
regarding
Freedom of Expression in Gujarat
 
 
In the wake of the Gujarat State Freedom of Expression Conference which was held in Ahmedabad on June 22nd 2008, a representative group met the Governor of Gujarat
 
Shri Naval Kishore Sharma at the Raj Bhavan  in Gandhinagar  today and handed over to him a Memorandum together with the Resolution of the Conference.
 
The delegation representing several sections of civil society consisted Shri Gautam Thaker, Gujarat State Secretary of the Peoples Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL), Shri Digant Oza, National Convenor of the Peoples Movement of India and Fr. Cedric Prakash, Director of PRASHANT.
 
The delegation appraised the Governor, of the Conference and urged him as the Constitutional Head of the State, to do all within his capacity to ensure that the Constitutional Right of Freedom of Expression and Conscience is no longer throttled in this State.
 
The Governor gave the delegation a patient hearing and assured that he would do his very best to address the issue.
 
 
GAUTAM THAKER                            
SECRETARY,  P.U.C.L.                      
                                                                                                                           
FR. CEDRIC PRAKASH                                                                                                                                                    
DIRECTOR, PRASHANT                              
 
DIGANT OZA
SENIOR JOURNALIST
NATIONAL CONVENOR
PEOPLE'S MOVEMENT OF INDIA
                                                                                         
 
24th June 2008
 
 
=============================
 
 
GUJARAT STATE
THE FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION CONFERENCE

Organized by
J.P. Centenary Committee, PUCL, MSD, PRASHANT, Nirikshak, Bhoomi Putra, Nayamarg,  Jalseva
C/o. Gandhi Peace Foundation, Himavan, Paldi, Ahmedabad 380 007
Ph: 079-26641353     Cell: 9825382556     email: 
dn.rath@gmail.com
                                                                                                                                            Date : 24-6-2008
 
 
MEMORANDUM
 
Subject : Sedition charges on Times of India, case against Shri Ashish Nandy and
               other Freedom of Expression issues.
 
To: 
 
Shri Navalkishore Sharma,
The Governor of Gujarat,
Gandhinagar.
 
Respected Sir,
 
The Gujarat State Freedom of Expression Conference was held on 22nd June, 2008 at Bhaikaka Bhavan, Near Law Garden, Ahmedabad to uphold the Freedom of Expression.  The Conference was presided by Shri Chunibhai Vaidya, Senior Sarvodaya Leader.   Senior Journalist Shri Kuldip Nayar, Justice Raginder Sachar and Shri Kannabiran, the President of P.U.C.L. were the distinguished Speakers at the Conference.

The Conference was organized by P.U.C.L., Movement for Secular Democracy, J.P.Centenary Committee, PRASHANT, Nirikshak, Nayamarg, Bhoomi Putra and Jalseva.  The Conference was attended by citizens of the State from all walks of life in large numbers.
 
The other Speakers at the Conference were Prof. J. S. Bandukwala, Advocate Girishbhai Patel, Digant Oza, Indukumar Jani, Dwarika Nath Rath, Fr. Cedric Prakash and Gautam Thaker.
 
The following Resolution was passed at the Conference unanimously and it was decided to submit a Memorandum to the Governor of Gujarat.  On behalf of the Conference, we are submitting this Memorandum to you along with the copy of the Resolution for your knowledge and prompt measures to check the abuse of power and assault on Freedom of Expression and human rights in the State.
 
 
Thanking you,
 
 
Yours faithfully,
 
 
GAUTAM THAKER                            
SECRETARY,  P.U.C.L.                      
                                                                                                                           
FR. CEDRIC PRAKASH                                                                                                                                                    
DIRECTOR, PRASHANT                              
 
DIGANT OZA
SENIOR JOURNALIST
NATIONAL CONVENOR
PEOPLE'S MOVEMENT OF INDIA
==============================
 
 
22ND, JUNE - FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION CONFERENCE
 
 
THE  RESOLUTION
 
Gujarat State Level Conference of freedom of Expression of Gujarat recalls the black days of emergency where all the fundamental rights, democratic, civil rights were trampled and thousands were put behind the bar. Pre censorship on media was imposed and various newspapers, journals were sealed off including Bhoomi Putra of Gujarat.
 
Though it is going to be the 34th year of emergency, the trail of it is still endangering the democracy where the freedom of expression is becoming the worst casualty. It is under surveillance. Now the charge of sedition on Times of India, cases against Ashish Nandy, attack on Kumar Ketkar and many other journalists and media throughout the country, imprisonment of civil right activist Dr. Binayak Sen and others and the promulgation of draconian acts in various parts of the country is a matter of grave concern. Minorities choose to remain silent but waiting for the justice.The dalits, the poor workers, marginalized section and the women hardly have any forum where they can express freely about their plights. Freedom of Religion Law which the Government has enacted from April 1st 2008.  curbs the right of a citizen from Freely expressing and choosing the religion of his/her choice. This conference takes serious note of all these developments related to freedom of expression.
 
The Conference would like to draw the attention that according to a survey conducted by media advocacy group in Paris during October 2006, ranking countries from best to worst in protecting the freedom of press, India was ranked at 115 in restoring press freedom
 
 The recent sedition charge against TOI has alarmed all the democracy loving people in the country which has evoked country wide protest.
 
First of all this conference condemn the sedition charge against Times of India, a tip of an iceberg in Gujarat. Several press have also been the victim in Gujarat. It is a direct assault on freedom of Press, which is the fourth Estate in a democratic country.  Registering the case against Times of India is a deliberate action of Police to suppress the voice of dissent of the press and create an atmosphere of panic in the state, where violation of human rights and Democratic rights is becoming a regular practice of the Police and Govt. in Gujarat in overt and covert fashion for last so many years.
 
The features carried by Times of India exposing the close  nexus between Police officer Mr. O.P. Mathur with Mr. Abdul Latif , is not only appalling but raises  serious question about the credibility of  the Police Officer in high rank  and  level of criminalization of Police in the state.
 
The Ahmedabad city Police Commissioner Mr. O.P.Mathur instead of responding to the documented investigative report published by the Times of India either by refuting the charges or by filing defamation case but to treat the reports questioning his competence as amounting to excite hatred, contempt or dissatisfaction towards the Govt. reflects his undemocratic character and audacity to equate himself as Govt. established by law. If Mr. Mathur has acted with the approval of the Govt., it exposes how the state attempts to suppress democratic dissent., which can be a British colonial hang over.
 
So, any threat to freedom of  press and freedom of expression by any quarter of the administration is a direct threat to democracy and perpetuate fascist type of rule
 
The role of media as the watchdog of democracy and its role to disseminate right to information to the citizen is always indispensable, which the Times of India has been performing.
 
The charge of Sedition or prosecution of media persons is not new in Gujarat. It has become a normal practice.IPC section 124 (A) has been used at will against the editors, reporters in Gujarat and they are put behind the bars
 
·   The reporter of AajTak was charged because of telecasting the news exposing the indifferent attitude of the Modi Govt. towards the orphan of the riot victim of Naroda Patia , as assured by the then   
    President of India Dr.A.P.J. Abdul Kalam.The editor of Samana of Surat was prosecuted due to its coverage on the Surat flood.
 
·   The editor of Aajkal of Rajkot was charged with 124A because of coverage of news exposing the nexus between Police and the Underworld in Bhavnagar.
 
·   The editor of Young Aarohi of Veraval was framed 124A because of carrying the news exposing the Arms traffiking. 124A was also filed against
 
·   Ms. Nafisa Ali and daily Divya Bhaskar on her comment on carnage 2002.There are innumerable overt and covert threats to the media in the state.
 
Inspite of the threat the media is doing its best to be the watchdog of democracy. But the fear of sedition, defamation, prosecutions etc.pushing the media towards self censorship.
 
The degree of regimentation and undemocratic atmosphere prevailing in the state can be gauzed the way the film Parzania was not allowed to be screened and the Fanaa was pulled down from the theatres.
 
Now Prof. Ashish Nandy is facing police case registered against him. Prof. Ashish Nandy wrote an article "Blame the Middle Classes?" after the Gujarat elections. He gave his analysis of the election outcome. A criminal case has been filed for writing this article under IPC Section 153 (A) and (B), with the permission of Government of Gujarat. Shockingly the head of the Gujarat Branch of the National Council of Civil Liberties has filed the case.
 
Press freedom is also threatened by the violence of political parties as well as religious fundamentalist forces and various brigades backed by powerful persons in power. Attack on freedom of expression is also growing from non-State actors, and the intolerant fascist groups.
 
 The attack on the residence of Mr. Kumar Ketkar, editor of the popular Marathi newspaper Loksatta, is the latest in a series of growing incidents of intolerance and violence in India against members of the media, which this conference condemn severely
 
Moreover Freedom of expression is gagged in the name of so-called development. More and more restrictions are imposed  to curb freedom of gathering, holding meetings and rallies.
 
This Conference would like to reiterate that the history of press in India is filled with stories of struggle and sacrifice. The Freedom of the Press was one of the constitutional guarantees demanded by freedom fighters during British colonial rule.  Most of the leaders of the freedom movement were journalists. They were for freedom of expression. After Independence the Founding Fathers  attached great importance to Freedom of the Press during framing the Constitution of India
 
In a series of decisions from 1950 onwards the Supreme Court has ruled that Freedom of the Press is implicit in the guarantee of freedom of speech and expression in Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution The Supreme Court of India has stated that 'freedom of speech and expression of opinion is of paramount importance under a democratic Constitution. The court has also declared that newspapers constitute the Fourth Estate of the country, Freedom of the press is undoubtedly one of the basic freedoms in a democratic society based on the Rule of Law
 
But after 61 years of freedom, the freedom of press and the freedom of expression is a far cry. Officials harass journalists through lawsuits, using restrictive laws governing criminal defamation, contempt of court, and national security to silence the reporters. Accreditation cards to journalists are denied.
 
Apart from it, self censorship is not only practiced by the media and media persons but also by the citizens. A sense of insecurity and fear is lurking. The citizens are scared to speak fearlessly and apprehend that they have to pay a price for freedom of expression. Silence is preferred than to invite the wrath of the Govt. or the so called brigades. This very aspect is killing the spirit of democracy and creating a ground for fascism, the worst enemy of the civilization. This is the most appalling aspect that can be ever comprehended in the state. of Gujarat
 
Under these circumstances, this Conference of Freedom of Expression pledge to uphold and fight for the freedom of expression to save the democracy from growing fascist onslaught.
 
So we demand-
 
1-Withdrawal of the charge of sedition and conspiracy immediately
 
2-Institute a high level judicial enquiry on the charges against Mr. O.P. Mathur
 
3-The column of Sedition be scrapped permanently from I.P.C..
 
4- The Home Minister of Gujarat should come out with the clarification on the charge of Sedition against Times of India
 
5- All the cases against media persons be withdrawn.
 
6- Release Dr. Binayak Sen
 
7-Scrap all draconian acts encroaching freedom of expression.
 
8- A congenial atmosphere of confidence building measure for freedom of expression be released.
 
9- Review all the cases of the detainees under TADA and PASA
 
 
 
Conference   organised by-
JP Centenary committee, PUCL, MSD,PRASHANT, Nirikshak, BhoomiPutra,Nayamarg,Jalseva
 
 

 

Tuesday, June 17, 2008

LEADER ARTICLE: Blame The Middle Class - 8 Jan 2008, 0000 hrs IST, Ashish Nandy

 
[This is the article which has become a cause celebre triggering off a raging controversy by inviting legal harassment by the Gujarat government.]
 
 
 
 
Now that the dust has settled over the Gujarat elections, we can afford to defy the pundits and admit that, even if Narendra Modi had lost the last elections, it would not have made much difference to the culture of Gujarat politics. Modi had already done his job. Most of the state's urban middle class would have remained mired in its inane versions of communalism and parochialism and the VHP and the Bajrang Dal would have continued to set the tone of state politics. Forty years of dedicated propaganda does pay dividends, electorally and socially.
 
The Hindus and the Muslims of the state — once bonded so conspicuously by language, culture and commerce — have met the demands of both V D Savarkar and M A Jinnah. They now face each other as two hostile nations. The handful of Gujarati social and political activists who resist the trend are seen not as dissenters but as treacherous troublemakers who should be silenced by any means, including surveillance, censorship and direct violence. As a result, Gujarati cities, particularly its educational institutions are turning cultural deserts. Gujarat has already disowned the Indian Constitution and the state apparatus has adjusted to the change.
 
The Congress, the main opposition party, has no effective leader. Nor does it represent any threat to the mainstream politics of Gujarat. The days of grass-roots leaders like Jhinabhai Darji are past and a large section of the party now consists of Hindu nationalists. The national leadership of the party does not have the courage to confront Modi over 2002, given its abominable record of 1984.
 
The Left is virtually non-existent in Gujarat. Whatever minor presence it once had among intellectuals and trade unionists is now a vague memory. The state has disowned Gandhi, too; Gandhian politics arouses derision in middle-class Gujarat. Except for a few valiant old-timers, Gandhians have made peace with their conscience by withdrawing from the public domain. Gandhi himself has been given a saintly, Hindu nationalist status and shelved. Even the Gujarati translations of his Complete Works have been stealthily distorted to conform to the Hindu nationalist agenda.
 
Gujarati Muslims too are "adjusting" to their new station. Denied justice and proper compensation, and as second-class citizens in their home state, they have to depend on voluntary efforts and donor agencies. The state's refusal to provide relief has been partly met by voluntary groups having fundamentalist sympathies. They supply aid but insist that the beneficiaries give up Gujarati and take to Urdu, adopt veil, and send their children to madrassas. Events like the desecration of Wali Gujarati's grave have pushed one of India's culturally richest, most diverse, vernacular Islamic traditions to the wall. Future generations will as gratefully acknowledge the sangh parivar's contribution to the growth of radical Islam in India as this generation remembers with gratitude the handsome contribution of Rajiv Gandhi and his cohorts to Sikh militancy.
 
The secularist dogma of many fighting the sangh parivar has not helped matters. Even those who have benefited from secular lawyers and activists relate to secular ideologies instrumentally. They neither understand them nor respect them. The victims still derive solace from their religions and, when under attack, they cling more passionately to faith. Indeed, shallow ideologies of secularism have simultaneously broken the back of Gandhism and discouraged the emergence of figures like Ali Shariatis, Desmond Tutus and the Dalai Lama — persons who can give suffering a new voice audible to the poor and the powerless and make a creative intervention possible from within worldviews accessible to the people.
 
Finally, Gujarat's spectacular development has underwritten the de-civilising process. One of the worst-kept secrets of our times is that dramatic development almost always has an authoritarian tail. Post-World War II Asia too has had its love affair with developmental despotism and the censorship, surveillance and thought control that go with it. The East Asian tigers have all been maneaters most of the time. Gujarat has now chosen to join the pack. Development in the state now justifies amorality, abridgement of freedom, and collapse of social ethics.
 
Is there life after Modi? Is it possible to look beyond the 35 years of rioting that began in 1969 and ended in 2002? Prima facie, the answer is "no". We can only wait for a new generation that will, out of sheer self-interest and tiredness, learn to live with each other. In the meanwhile, we have to wait patiently but not passively to keep values alive, hoping that at some point will come a modicum of remorse and a search for atonement and that ultimately Gujarati traditions will triumph over the culture of the state's urban middle class.
 
Recovering Gujarat from its urban middle class will not be easy. The class has found in militant religious nationalism a new self- respect and a new virtual identity as a martial community, the way Bengali babus, Maharashtrian Brahmins and Kashmiri Muslims at different times have sought salvation in violence. In Gujarat this class has smelt blood, for it does not have to do the killings but can plan, finance and coordinate them with impunity. The actual killers are the lowest of the low, mostly tribals and Dalits. The middle class controls the media and education, which have become hate factories in recent times. And they receive spirited support from most non-resident Indians who, at a safe distance from India, can afford to be more nationalist, bloodthirsty, and irresponsible.
 
The writer is a political psychologist.
 
Peace is doable.
 

 

Wednesday, June 04, 2008

"TERRORISM" : THE GUJARAT WAY....- Fr. Cedric Prakash sj

 
 
 
Gujarat State has done it once again !
 
In a predawn "swoop" on Sunday, 1st June, the City Police Commissioner O. P. Mathur,  filed a complaint against the Resident Editor of the Time of India, Mr. Bharat Desai, a Correspondent, Mr. Prashant Dayal and a Photographer (actually, the photographer named is Mr. Gautam Mehta who is currently with the 'Gujarat Samachar' and not with 'The Times of India'). 
 
According to Mathur, the persons named had committed offences against Sections 124A (Sedition), 120B (Criminal Conspiracy),  and 34 (Common Intent) of the IPC.

What "The Times of India" (TOI) did, was to publish a series of articles beginning May 28th, with serious questions raised on the newly appointed Police Commissioner of Ahmedabad.  The first article entitled "How can Ahmedabad be safe in his hands ?" raised a key question as to whether, as the head of the Latif squad, Mathur was actually "on the don's payroll".  It also highlighted the fact that as DGP, CID (Crime and Jails) and somebody in charge of the Sabarmati Jail, mobile phones and SIM cards were freely used by hardcore criminals in the jail premises including regular calls made to Pakistan.
 
In a second article entitled "OPM high A'bad can do without" the TOI brought to the attention of its readers, a case registered against Mathur for attempting to sexual harassment and issuing threats to a woman lawyer.  Another article alongside, emphasized the fact that inspite of being the head of the Latif squad in 1992, he did not go to arrest Latif in Ahmedabad.
 
The final article entitled "Crooked path to the crown" very emphatically states that O. P. Mathur got the position of Police Commissioner of Ahmedabad, as a reward for botching up the probe into the fake encounter of Sohrabuddin, a close associate of mafia don Latif.  The "dead" Sohrabuddin grabbed national headlines when senior IPS officers were arrested and are still in jail for killing him in a fake encounter apparently because "he was in Gujarat to kill the CM" !.  Most human rights activists and other civil society members found it hard to believe that an extortionist like Sohrabuddin would want to kill the CM !  When the truth was finally revealed, an important CD which apparently had telephone records of top ranking BJP politicians of the State, went missing.  This CD went missing when it was in Mathur's custody and it apparently provided the confidence, according to the TOI,  to the Gujarat Government to admit in an affidavit to the Supreme Court "that the Sohrabuddin encounter was fake and that is why Kauserbi was also killed by the same policemen".
 
This final story seemed to be the last nail in the coffin of Mathur.  On the same day (May 30th),  the Times of India conducted among its readers, a high profile survey "Do you want O.P. Mathur to continue as Commissioner of Police, Ahmedabad ?".   The  response, when it was published next day had an overwhelming  98% of the respondents saying that "he had to be shown the door", whilst just 2% said "no".  With his back to the wall, the Commissioner then filed the complaint of Sedition" and "Conspiracy against the State".

Human Rights Activists, media personnel, intellectuals and others from all walks of life have come out openly to protest against the charges made by the Commissioner.  Several questions are  being raised :
 
Ø      Does the media have the responsibility of revealing the Truth to the public ?
 
Ø      Does the State / Administration have the right to gag the media, to suppress the Constitutional Right of the Freedom of Speech and Expression ?
 
Ø      How does raking up the muck of the Police Commissioner's past (and apparently of his "dubious" links), give him an opportunity to file charges as serious as Sedition and  
         Conspiracy against the State ?
 
Ø      Is the Police Commissioner The State ? 
 
What Gujarat experiences today is yet  another "milestone" in the emergence of a fascist State.  The nexus between the  politicians and the police in the Gujarat Carnage  was very evident.  When Dalits, Adivasis and Minorities are bashed up by the right-wing Hindu elements, practically no cases are allowed to be filed against the perpetrators.  When the media, which is an indispensable pillar of democracy, stands up for the Truth, every attempt is made to muzzle its voice.  If this is not terrorism, what is ? 
 
Civil society in Gujarat has allowed too much to happen in too short a period time.  It has to come out loud and strong to stop those who are responsible for such acts of "terrorism".
 
  
 
(* Fr. Cedric Prakash sj is the Director of "Prashant", the Ahmedabad-based Jesuit Centre for Human Rights, Justice and Peace)
 
 
 
' PRASHANT ' 
 Ahmedabad   380 052
Gujarat, India
 
 
 
4th June  2008